Tag Archives: Healthcare Reform

Affordable Care Act subsidies: How does your state benefit?

How much does your state benefit from Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies?

Milliman’s recently published 50-state profile of the individual health insurance market presents nationwide enrollment and subsidy data that can help states better understand the funding and coverage requirements under the ACA. The infographic below sheds light on some of the 2017 results, including marketplace enrollment numbers by state, and a closer look at the ACA cost-sharing reduction (CSR) subsidies—for which government funding is currently under legal challenge.

Considerations for Patient and State Stability Fund stakeholders

As the healthcare reform debate continues in Washington, D.C., it is worth revisiting one of the key components of the proposed American Health Care Act (AHCA). The Patient and State Stability Fund (PSSF) is a grant program included in AHCA intended to stabilize individual and small group state insurance markets and lower patient costs. The PSSF would appropriate a total of $100 billion to states over the period 2018 through 2026. In this paper, Milliman’s Paul Houchens, Kathleen Ely, and Thomas Murawski discuss elements of the PSSF as proposed by the American Health Care Act (AHCA) on March 6, 2017. The authors also explore the following considerations for stakeholders.

• Value of reinsurance option
• Short application window
• State-specific impact of AHCA provisions
• High-risk pools
• State-run cost-sharing subsidies
• State-run premium subsidies
• Reduced Medicaid enrollment and benefits
• PSSF grant allocation methodology
• Promotion of and payment for preventive care
• Impact to healthcare providers

Consumer transparency issues in an evolving individual health insurance market

Consumers in the individual and small group health insurance markets want to understand the future of their health insurance. This paper by Milliman actuaries Esther Blount and Andrew Bourg highlights the steps the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) has in place to promote consumer knowledge in the individual market and the pros and cons of removing such initiatives.

Summary of individual market enrollment and Affordable Care Act subsidies

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) introduced many changes to the individual health insurance market beginning in calendar year (CY) 2014, including new rating rules and the introduction of federal financial assistance to purchase health insurance through the insurance marketplaces. It is important for state policymakers to understand the health and stability of the individual health insurance market and how the ACA has affected its health insurance consumers.

Milliman actuaries Paul Houchens, Jason Clarkson, and Zachary Fohl have prepared a profile of the individual health insurance market for each state along with the District of Columbia (DC). The profile summarizes insurer financials, marketplace enrollment, and federal assistance provided to households purchasing insurance coverage through the insurance marketplaces, incorporating recently released data from the 2017 open enrollment period.

Pent-up uncertainty may lead to more demand among Americans

While legislation to repeal and replace the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) has halted for now, the future of American healthcare remains in flux. In this article, Milliman’s Kim Hiemenz and Michelle Klein discuss how the uncertainty surrounding healthcare may lead to pent-up demand among many Americans.

Changes to actuarial soundness requirements may or may not accompany changes to Medicaid funding

Proposals to change federal funding for state Medicaid programs using block grants or per capita caps could affect federal actuarial soundness requirements for Medicaid managed care capitation rates. In this article, Milliman’s Michael Cook discusses the following three scenarios that could play out if changes to Medicaid funding happen.

• The continuation of federal actuarial soundness requirements under revised federal funding is a plausible scenario.
• The establishing of individual state requirements if federal requirements are eliminated.
• The continued development of actuarially sound capitation rates by individual states even in the absence of any soundness requirements.