Does the proximity of IT firms influence the cost of EMR?

The National Bureau of Economic Research published a new paper (payment may be required) examining the “relationship between the adoption of electronic medical records (EMR) and hospital operating costs at thousands of US hospitals between 1996 and 2009.”

Here is an excerpt from the study’s abstract:

We find evidence consistent with this approach, namely, that: (1) EMR adoption is initially associated with a rise in costs; (2) EMR adoption at hospitals in favorable conditions – such as urban locations – leads to a decrease in costs after three years; and (3) Hospitals in unfavorable conditions experience a sharp increase in costs even after six years.

“Unfavorable conditions” include greater distance from information technology hubs, meaning that rural hospitals are less likely to see a short-term return on their EMR/EHR investment.

Today’s most competitive healthcare organizations are data-driven. Brian Studebaker and Roger Connolly provide perspective into innovative business intelligence (BI)—the process of turning data into actionable information… Read their paper on getting a return on investment out of business intelligence here.

Click on electronic health records for more insights.

One thought on “Does the proximity of IT firms influence the cost of EMR?

  1. Agreed that remote areas have problems for electronic health records. But these issues can be reduced using cloud/web based ehr software, as these don’t require special hardware like servers, backup machines, firewalls, electricity backups. Practices having Internet connection, even not fast one, can access them. And their data is stored in the cloud, so there are less security, crash, failure issues as compared to application based software.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *