Category Archives: Accountablity

Physician groups and actuaries

American Medical News looks at actuarial skill sets and how they can help physician groups working with new payment models. Here is an excerpt from the article, which is titled “When you need an actuary.”

An actuary can identify which patients should be enrolled in a managed care program and stratify the practice’s patients into groups that carry different levels of risk, said Art Wilmes, an Indianapolis-based principal and consulting actuary for consulting firm Milliman. The actuary can gauge the potential variation in clinical outcomes and the likelihood that a pool of patients will need more care than anticipated by the contract terms.

The actuary’s analysis can help identify which patients’ care and what type of management — for example, congestive heart failure patients versus those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease — carry the most potential savings and clinical improvement. That way, the practice can decide where best to focus time and effort.

“The key is when you want to optimize your management of a patient, you need to understand whether they will respond to [health] management activities,” Wilmes said. “Those are, in my mind, the tools that health systems and physicians will need.”

Healthcare reform’s impact on the MPL insurance industry

As Americans await the Supreme Court’s decision on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), many providers are moving forward with efforts to develop accountable care organizations (ACOs).  While not always well documented, this movement and other aspects of the PPACA raise questions for medical professional liability (MPL) insurers.

A new article by Derek Jones, “Medical Professional Liability: The Other Insurance Market Affected by Health Reform,” takes a comprehensive look at how ACOs and other reforms, such as the PPACA’s Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) and the Act’s Section 10607, may affect MPL insurers.

For more perspective on ACOs, check out this video.

ACOs and MPL

We’ve blogged often about accountable care organizations (ACOs) and about medical professional liability (MPL). But how do the two tie together? Recent coverage by Best’s Insurance News digs into the connection between the two:

ACOs may be a new market for physician insurers, but the risk insured will be a familiar one.

“How do we approach this market as an opportunity?” asked Chad Karls, principal and consulting actuary for Milliman, Inc., during the session.

The first thing to know is the medical professional liability risks that an ACO will have. “Don’t lose sight of that,” he said. “That is the elephant in the room when it comes to ACO insurance coverage needs. That medical professional liability is the single largest risk.”

Accountable care organizations: MSSP vs. Pioneer

Healthcare trends have been on the rise during the last few years and there are growing concerns over the financial stability of the Medicare program. There are also concerns regarding the aging of the Baby Boomers, the increase in average age of enrollees, and an insufficient tax base to cover future funding of the Medicare program. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) attempts to address some of these growing concerns by implementing laws and programs aimed at reducing healthcare costs. The Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) as well as the Pioneer program are two such initiatives.

This paper compares the MSSP and Pioneer ACOs and outlines their key features in terms of six major areas: payment arrangements, beneficiary alignment, interim payment methodology, benchmark methodology, trending methodology, and calculation of shared savings/losses.

Pioneer ACOs in action

California Healthline looks at San Diego-based Sharp HealthCare’s selection as a Pioneer accountable care organization (we blogged about this brand of ACOs earlier this week). Here is an excerpt:

According to Alison Fleury, CEO of the Sharp HealthCare ACO, the ability to inform beneficiaries ahead of time whether they were assigned to an ACO was an important step in learning about the population Sharp will be managing.

Under the program, beneficiaries who received the majority of their care from a care provider within an ACO network during the past three years are aligned with that ACO.

Finally, the ability to move from a shared-savings model to a population-based payment arrangement was very important for many organizations.

“One thing at least some of the organizations are excited about is that eventually CMS would be willing to go to a capitated approach. I think a lot of these Pioneer ACOs, given that they are leaders in care coordination already, like that option,” said John Pickering, principal consulting actuary with the actuarial and consulting firm Milliman…

Continue reading

ACO gain/loss sharing

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has proposed a shared savings arrangement with hospitals, physicians, and other healthcare providers that integrates and coordinates their services through accountable care organizations (ACOs) and achieves cost savings to Medicare as a result. In return, CMS offers, through the Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP), to return a portion of the amounts saved to the ACOs.

MSSP applications are due early in 2012 for ACO starting dates of April 1 or July 1, 2012. An application must include a plan for distributing shared savings or losses to providers within the proposed ACO, but CMS has not spelled out procedures for developing such a plan. Drawing up a savings-distribution plan requires careful, detailed decisions potentially affecting every provider entity within the new system.

The framework for allocating savings within an ACO is described in a new paper; the framework emphasizes rewards for an ACO’s component entities based on their relative contributions to the organization’s total shared savings and quality performance.

The paper focuses on CMS-contracted MSSP ACOs, as contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) of 2010, because they are facing the task as an immediate issue. However, the approach could also be applied to risk-sharing arrangements within any integrated delivery system.

Find the full paper here.