Archive

Archive for the ‘Benefit news’ Category

Guidance released on 90-day waiting period for health coverage

April 5th, 2013

On March 21, 2013, the U.S. Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and Treasury published proposed regulations to implement the 90-day waiting period limitation required by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) for grandfathered and non-grandfathered group health plans and insurance. The proposed rule, which when published in final form would be effective for plan years beginning in 2014, is generally consistent with the agencies’ guidance (IRS Notice 2012-59) published in August 2012 and modifies existing requirements such as preexisting condition limitations.

The agencies indicate that group health plans and health insurance issuers may rely on the proposed rule at least through the end of 2014, just as they may on the August 2012 guidance.

The ACA prohibits a group health plan or health insurance issuer offering group health coverage from applying any waiting period longer than 90 days for an individual to be covered for benefits. One plan eligibility requirement that multiemployer health plans frequently apply is the cumulative hours-of-service requirement. The newly published proposed rule includes several clarifications regarding this:

• If a group health plan conditions eligibility on any employee’s (part-time or full-time) having completed a number of “cumulative hours of service,” the plan will not be deemed as designed to avoid compliance with the 90-day waiting period limitation if the cumulative hours of service does not exceed 1,200 hours
• A plan’s waiting period must begin once the employee satisfies the cumulative service requirement and cannot exceed 90 days
• The same individual must not be subject to multiple eligibility requirements annually (i.e., this provision is designed to be a one-time eligibility requirement)
• Other conditions for eligibility (i.e., those that are not based solely on the lapse of a time period, such as compensation) are generally permissible unless the condition is designed to avoid compliance with the 90-day waiting period limitation

The proposed rule does not include a “three month” replacement for the 90-day requirement nor grant plan sponsors the ability to provide coverage effective the first of the month after 90 days. The regulators stated that because the ACA specifies 90 days, they did not have the flexibility to modify the waiting period, and all calendar days—including weekends and holidays—are counted beginning on the individual’s enrollment date.

The proposed rule also provides another clarification of interest to multiemployer plan sponsors: Plans with “hour banks” or eligibility provisions that allow workers to bank excess hours from one measurement period and draw down those hours in another to prevent lapses in coverage are permitted to allow participants to make a “self-payment” or “buy in” to satisfy any otherwise permissible hours-of-service requirement.

The proposed rule also would amend ACA regulations already in effect, as well as those that will become effective beginning in 2014. For example, it makes conforming amendments to the preexisting condition limitations and other portability provisions under HIPAA, as well as to some implementing regulations because they have become moot or need revisions because of the ACA’s new market reform protections. Under the proposed rule, a technical amendment eliminates the need for plan sponsors to provide HIPAA certificates of creditable coverage beginning on December 31, 2014.

For more information about the federal agencies’ announcement, please contact your Milliman consultant.

Benefit news ,

Final rule on affordability of family health coverage and health insurance premium tax credit

February 19th, 2013

Employees’ family members who are eligible to enroll in the employees’ group health plan will be ineligible for federal subsidies under the exchanges if the employees are offered affordable self-only healthcare coverage, according to the final rule published on February 1 by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The final rule retains the provision in the IRS’s proposed rule basing the affordability test of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) on the cost of self-only coverage, rather than family coverage. Thus, an employee’s contribution toward the premium for family coverage is not taken into account when determining whether an employer is subject to penalties for not offering affordable coverage that satisfies PPACA’s minimum value standard. The IRS’s final rule may result in limiting federal healthcare premium subsidies for employees’ family members who purchase insurance from the exchanges beginning in 2014.

Under PPACA, employees eligible for an employer-sponsored health plan that is deemed “not affordable” can opt out of the coverage and receive a federal subsidy to help them purchase insurance in the exchanges. They are eligible for a federal health insurance premium tax credit, which is based on income as a percentage of the federal poverty level (FPL), if their employer-sponsored plan is deemed “not affordable,” i.e., if their share of the premium is more than 9.5% of household income. In addition, PPACA subjects employers to a $3,000 penalty for each full-time employee whose premium share exceeds the threshold of 9.5% of household income and who receives the subsidy to purchase exchange coverage.

In a related proposed rule also published February 1, the IRS said that family members of an employee who is offered affordable, self-only coverage will not be subject to the PPACA individual mandate penalty, which is applicable to individuals who do not obtain insurance if the employee’s premium share for family coverage exceeds 8% of household income and family members do not enroll in the coverage. This proposed rule cannot be relied upon at this time.

Employers should review their employee contribution and eligibility strategy for all employees to avoid unnecessarily limiting premium tax credit options under the exchanges for employees and their dependents.

For more information about the final rule or for assistance with implementing PPACA’s requirements, please contact your Milliman consultant.

Benefit news , , ,

Employer deadline for notification about 2014 healthcare exchanges postponed

January 31st, 2013

The U.S. Departments of Labor (DOL), Health and Human Services (HHS), and Treasury have announced that employer notification to employees regarding Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) health insurance exchanges will be postponed beyond the March 1, 2013, statutory deadline. Although the announcement does not specify a new date, it states that the timing for distribution of the notices will be in the late summer or fall of 2013, which will coordinate with the open enrollment period that begins in October 2013 for purchasing health insurance through the new exchanges. While there is no action for employers at this time, they should anticipate questions from employees as more attention is paid to this topic.

PPACA requires employers to provide all new hires and current employees a written notice about the exchanges. The notice must:

• Inform employees about the existence of the exchanges and give a description of the services provided

• Explain that employees may be eligible for a federal premium tax credit or a cost-sharing reduction if they purchase health insurance through the exchange because their employer’s plan does not meet the 60% “minimum value” standard

• Specify that employees purchasing coverage through exchanges may lose any employer contributions toward the cost of employer-provided coverage, and that all or a portion of the employer contributions may be excludable for federal income tax purposes.

The DOL is considering providing model generic language that could be used to satisfy the notice requirement or, alternatively, language based on information from the employer coverage template under the January 22, 2013, proposed rule on Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Programs, and exchanges.

The delayed notification announcement appears in the federal agencies’ “FAQs about Affordable Care Act Implementation (Part XI),” dated January 24, 2013. The document also provides guidance on health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) and other account-based arrangements; the DOL’s plan not to bring enforcement action against certain self-insured group health plans that are Employer Group Waiver Plans; fixed indemnity insurance policies that are not “excepted” benefits; and payment of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute fee by multiemployer plans.

For more information about the federal agencies’ announcement or for assistance with implementing PPACA’s requirements, please contact your Milliman consultant.

Benefit news , , , ,

IRS proposes rule on employer “shared responsibility” under PPACA

January 30th, 2013

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has issued a proposed rule on payments that certain employers will be subject to if they do not offer a minimum level of affordable healthcare coverage to their full-time employees beginning in 2014. The employer “shared responsibility” requirement under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) applies to employers with at least 50 full-time employees (taking into account full-time equivalent employees) if at least one of those employees receives a federal premium tax credit for purchasing individual coverage from a health insurance exchange in 2014. Employers may rely on the IRS’s proposed rule pending the publication of a final rule or other applicable guidance. Comments on the proposed rule must be submitted to the IRS by March 18, 2013.

This Client Action Bulletin discusses the proposed rule on the employer “shared responsibility” requirement under PPACA.

This blog first appeared at RetirementTownHall.com.

Benefit news , ,

COLAs for retirement, Social Security, and health benefits

October 24th, 2012

With the release of the September 2012 Consumer Price Index (CPI) the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Social Security Administration (SSA), and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) have announced cost-of-living adjusted figures for Social Security and retirement plan benefits, respectively, for 2013.

The 2013 adjusted figures for high-deductible health plans (HDHPs) and health savings accounts (HSAs) included in this Client Action Bulletin were released by the IRS earlier this year and are provided here for convenience.

This post was also published at RetirementTownHall.com.

Benefit news, Consumerism , , , ,

New guidance on W-2 health coverage reporting

January 10th, 2012

The latest Client Action Bulletin loooks at new guidance from the IRS on W-2 health coverage reporting.

Benefit news ,